Ad is loading...
BFOR vs MDY
BFOR vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts BFOR vs MDY
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$569.31
Change-$22.93 (-3.87%)
Volume$20.87K
CapitalizationN/A
BFOR vs MDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFOR vs. MDY commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFOR is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 25.3B vs. BFOR (156M). BFOR has a higher annual dividend yield than MDY: BFOR (22.000) vs MDY (17.724). BFOR was incepted earlier than MDY: BFOR (12 years) vs MDY (30 years). BFOR has a higher turnover MDY (20.07) vs MDY (20.07).
| BFOR | MDY | BFOR / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 22.000 | 17.724 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 156M | 25.3B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 83.00 | 20.07 | 414% |
| Yield | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BFOR | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 24 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BFOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFOR has been closely correlated with GMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFOR jumps, then GMS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFOR | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| GMS - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| BY - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| NTB - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| STEL - BFOR | 69% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| HUBB - BFOR | 69% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
More | ||||
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDY | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| UFPI - MDY | 81% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| KMT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| AVNT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| FBIN - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| KBH - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
More | ||||