Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFOR vs SCHM
BFOR vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BFOR vs SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.56
Change+$0.27 (+0.92%)
Volume$162
Net Assets12.14B
BFOR vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFOR vs. SCHM commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFOR is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. BFOR (183M). BFOR has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: BFOR (10.730) vs SCHM (6.841). BFOR was incepted earlier than SCHM: BFOR (12 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BFOR (0.65). BFOR has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| BFOR | SCHM | BFOR / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.730 | 6.841 | 157% |
| Net Assets | 183M | 12.1B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 13.00 | 692% |
| Yield | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BFOR | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 19 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BFOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFOR has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFOR jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFOR | 100% | -0.73% | ||
| SYF - BFOR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| BY - BFOR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| ESAB - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| HUBB - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| PLAB - BFOR | 71% Closely correlated | -2.69% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||