Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFOR vs VO
BFOR vs VO Comparison
Open Charts BFOR vs VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
Price$267.63
Change-$5.76 (-2.11%)
Volume$1.96K
Net Assets175.12B
BFOR vs VO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFOR vs. VO commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFOR is a Buy and VO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VO has more net assets: 175B vs. BFOR (156M). VO has a higher annual dividend yield than BFOR: VO (1.370) vs BFOR (1.183). BFOR was incepted earlier than VO: BFOR (12 years) vs VO (21 years). VO (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BFOR (0.65). BFOR has a higher turnover VO (16.00) vs VO (16.00).
| BFOR | VO | BFOR / VO | |
| Gain YTD | 1.183 | 1.370 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 156M | 175B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 16.00 | 563% |
| Yield | 0.73 | 1.61 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BFOR | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 16 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BFOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFOR has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFOR jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFOR | 100% | -1.87% | ||
| SYF - BFOR | 75% Closely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| BY - BFOR | 73% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| ESAB - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| HUBB - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| PLAB - BFOR | 71% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
VO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VO has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VO jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y