Advertisement
BFRG vs PDFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFRG is a Hold and PDFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFRG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePDFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BFRG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PDFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFRG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PDFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BFRG (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while PDFS (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
PDFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.22% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Packaged Software (+0.47% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| BFRG | PDFS | BFRG / PDFS | |
| Capitalization | 11.8M | 764M | 2% |
| EBITDA | -7.09M | 5.21M | -136% |
| Gain YTD | -37.500 | -28.545 | 131% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 967.50 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 186M | - |
| Total Cash | 3.8M | 54.1M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 164K | 73.4M | 0% |
PDFS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BFRG | PDFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 30 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
BFRG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFRG has been loosely correlated with SDGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFRG jumps, then SDGR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFRG | 100% | -2.34% | ||
| SDGR - BFRG | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| PDFS - BFRG | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| AI - BFRG | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| TEM - BFRG | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.06% | ||
| NTCT - BFRG | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
PDFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDFS has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDFS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDFS | 100% | +1.31% | ||
| SNPS - PDFS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| AMPL - PDFS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| CDNS - PDFS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| EVCM - PDFS | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| HUBS - PDFS | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||