BFS
Price
$34.26
Change
-$1.42 (-3.98%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
911.54M
27 days until earnings call
PECO
Price
$34.97
Change
-$1.09 (-3.02%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.39B
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BFS vs PECO

Header iconBFS vs PECO Comparison
Open Charts BFS vs PECOBanner chart's image
Saul Centers
Price$34.26
Change-$1.42 (-3.98%)
Volume$632
Capitalization911.54M
Phillips Edison & Company
Price$34.97
Change-$1.09 (-3.02%)
Volume$20.63K
Capitalization4.39B
BFS vs PECO Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFS vs. PECO commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a Hold and PECO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BFS: $35.68 vs. PECO: $36.06)
Brand notoriety: BFS and PECO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFS: 133% vs. PECO: 164%
Market capitalization -- BFS: $911.54M vs. PECO: $4.39B
BFS [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $911.54M. PECO’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $4.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePECO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PECO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFS is a better buy in the long-term than PECO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PECO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PECO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PECO is a better buy in the short-term than BFS.

Price Growth

BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while PECO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFS is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

PECO is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.65% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PECO($4.39B) has a higher market cap than BFS($912M). PECO has higher P/E ratio than BFS: PECO (73.06) vs BFS (21.97). PECO YTD gains are higher at: -2.904 vs. BFS (-6.567). PECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 384M vs. BFS (165M). PECO has more cash in the bank: 13.4M vs. BFS (8.41M). BFS has less debt than PECO: BFS (1.39B) vs PECO (2.08B). PECO has higher revenues than BFS: PECO (610M) vs BFS (257M).
BFSPECOBFS / PECO
Capitalization912M4.39B21%
EBITDA165M384M43%
Gain YTD-6.567-2.904226%
P/E Ratio21.9773.0630%
Revenue257M610M42%
Total Cash8.41M13.4M63%
Total Debt1.39B2.08B67%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFS: Fundamental Ratings
BFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSPECO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUXAX24.61N/A
N/A
Victory S&P 500 Index A
FLMVX36.45N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value L
SMCIX20.11N/A
N/A
Shelton S&P Smallcap Index Investor
CSCRX26.24N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Growth Inst2
GARIX19.77N/A
N/A
Gotham Absolute Return Institutional

BFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with KRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then KRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFS
1D Price
Change %
BFS100%
-2.03%
KRG - BFS
72%
Closely correlated
-5.51%
UE - BFS
71%
Closely correlated
-7.16%
OLP - BFS
71%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
PECO - BFS
68%
Closely correlated
-3.40%
FRT - BFS
68%
Closely correlated
-6.46%
More