BFS
Price
$30.75
Change
-$0.10 (-0.32%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
751.72M
29 days until earnings call
UHT
Price
$36.80
Change
-$0.46 (-1.23%)
Updated
Oct 8, 03:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
516.81M
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFS vs UHT

Header iconBFS vs UHT Comparison
Open Charts BFS vs UHTBanner chart's image
Saul Centers
Price$30.75
Change-$0.10 (-0.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization751.72M
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
Price$36.80
Change-$0.46 (-1.23%)
Volume$220
Capitalization516.81M
BFS vs UHT Comparison Chart in %
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFS vs. UHT commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a StrongBuy and UHT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BFS: $30.85 vs. UHT: $37.25)
Brand notoriety: BFS and UHT are both not notable
BFS represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while UHT is part of the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFS: 185% vs. UHT: 135%
Market capitalization -- BFS: $751.72M vs. UHT: $516.81M
BFS [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $751.72M. UHT’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $516.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.26B. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UHT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFS is a better buy in the long-term than UHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UHT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UHT is a better buy in the short-term than BFS.

Price Growth

BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -3.20% price change this week, while UHT (@Managed Health Care) price change was -4.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.03%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

UHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-1.45% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Managed Health Care (-3.02% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFS($752M) has a higher market cap than UHT($517M). UHT has higher P/E ratio than BFS: UHT (28.88) vs BFS (23.37). UHT YTD gains are higher at: 5.687 vs. BFS (-16.358). BFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 172M vs. UHT (67.9M). BFS has more cash in the bank: 5.3M vs. UHT (4.32M). UHT has less debt than BFS: UHT (384M) vs BFS (1.57B). BFS has higher revenues than UHT: BFS (278M) vs UHT (98.6M).
BFSUHTBFS / UHT
Capitalization752M517M145%
EBITDA172M67.9M253%
Gain YTD-16.3585.687-288%
P/E Ratio23.3728.8881%
Revenue278M98.6M282%
Total Cash5.3M4.32M123%
Total Debt1.57B384M408%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFS vs UHT: Fundamental Ratings
BFS
UHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
664
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
4370
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4255
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UHT's Valuation (5) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (31). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHT (100). This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHT’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's SMR Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (70). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.

UHT's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (78). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (55). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSUHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCPIX102.62N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Inv
IJMIX14.53N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Mid Cap Value I
DRDCX25.74N/A
N/A
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
GTSFX41.59N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
TREPX16.85N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq Premier