BFS
Price
$36.88
Change
-$0.08 (-0.22%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
911.54M
40 days until earnings call
UHT
Price
$37.27
Change
-$0.39 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
489.92M
Ad is loading...

BFS vs UHT

Header iconBFS vs UHT Comparison
Open Charts BFS vs UHTBanner chart's image
Saul Centers
Price$36.88
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
Volume$59.29K
Capitalization911.54M
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
Price$37.27
Change-$0.39 (-1.04%)
Volume$62.6K
Capitalization489.92M
BFS vs UHT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFS vs. UHT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a Hold and UHT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BFS: $36.88 vs. UHT: $37.27)
Brand notoriety: BFS and UHT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFS: 135% vs. UHT: 89%
Market capitalization -- BFS: $911.54M vs. UHT: $489.92M
BFS [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $911.54M. UHT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $489.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUHT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFS is a better buy in the long-term than UHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UHT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UHT is a better buy in the short-term than BFS.

Price Growth

BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while UHT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFS is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

UHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+2.35% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFS($912M) has a higher market cap than UHT($490M). UHT has higher P/E ratio than BFS: UHT (31.93) vs BFS (21.97). UHT YTD gains are higher at: 0.161 vs. BFS (-3.424). BFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 165M vs. UHT (65.2M). BFS (8.41M) and UHT (8.21M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . UHT has less debt than BFS: UHT (370M) vs BFS (1.39B). BFS has higher revenues than UHT: BFS (257M) vs UHT (95.6M).
BFSUHTBFS / UHT
Capitalization912M490M186%
EBITDA165M65.2M253%
Gain YTD-3.4240.161-2,124%
P/E Ratio21.9731.9369%
Revenue257M95.6M269%
Total Cash8.41M8.21M102%
Total Debt1.39B370M375%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFS vs UHT: Fundamental Ratings
BFS
UHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
961
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4072
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5972
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UHT's Valuation (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (56). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

UHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (100). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's SMR Rating (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (72). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (72). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.

UHT's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (72). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSUHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEMKX38.640.40
+1.05%
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
HCMSX29.650.23
+0.78%
HCM Tactical Growth R
JGEFX11.940.07
+0.59%
JHancock Global Equity I
NBNRX13.030.05
+0.39%
Neuberger Berman International Sel R3
EMCCX57.44-0.13
-0.23%
Empiric Class C

BFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with UE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then UE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFS
1D Price
Change %
BFS100%
-0.22%
UE - BFS
75%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
OLP - BFS
72%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
KRG - BFS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
BRX - BFS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
PECO - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
More

UHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHT has been loosely correlated with DEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UHT jumps, then DEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UHT
1D Price
Change %
UHT100%
-1.04%
DEA - UHT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
ALEX - UHT
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
GMRE - UHT
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
AAT - UHT
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
BFS - UHT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More