Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFSIX vs RWEBX
BFSIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts BFSIX vs RWEBX
BFS Equity Institutional
Price$26.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.78M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.77
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
BFSIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFSIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFSIX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. BFSIX (61.8M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than BFSIX: RWEBX (0.76) vs BFSIX (0.43). BFSIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: BFSIX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). BFSIX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BFSIX (16.10). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFSIX: RWEBX (250) vs BFSIX (1000). BFSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. RWEBX (3.78). BFSIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. RWEBX (40.82).
| BFSIX | RWEBX | BFSIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.06 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.088 | 8.175 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.8M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.76 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 3.78 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.41 | 27.15 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 40.82 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.66 | 66.81 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement