Ad is loading...
BFTHX vs VIGRX
BFTHX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts BFTHX vs VIGRX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
Price$47.85
Change+$0.65 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.21M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$185.55
Change+$3.72 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
BFTHX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTHX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTHX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. BFTHX (610M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than BFTHX: VIGRX (0.39) vs BFTHX (0.00). BFTHX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: BFTHX (21 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). BFTHX (1.03) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). BFTHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.38 vs. VIGRX (5.00). BFTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: BFTHX (2000) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. BFTHX (-0.19). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 110.62 vs. BFTHX (48.80).
| BFTHX | VIGRX | BFTHX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.17 | 588% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.468 | -13.943 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.19 | 2.03 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.18 | 30.35 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.80 | 110.62 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.49 | 225.76 | 68% |