Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFWFX vs RCWBX
BFWFX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts BFWFX vs RCWBX
American Funds Capital World Bond F2
Price$16.46
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.25
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
BFWFX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFWFX vs. RCWBX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFWFX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFWFX (9.97B) and RCWBX (9.97B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BFWFX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: BFWFX (3.71) vs RCWBX (2.78). BFWFX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: BFWFX (17 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). RCWBX (1.58) is less costly to investors than BFWFX (0.60). BFWFX (251.00) and RCWBX (251.00) have comparable annual turnover. BFWFX (250) and RCWBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BFWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.84 vs. RCWBX (2.82). BFWFX return over 5 years is better than : -12.32 vs. RCWBX (-16.14).
| BFWFX | RCWBX | BFWFX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.58 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.58 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.688 | 7.001 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.97B | 9.97B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 2.78 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.84 | 2.82 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.70 | 3.86 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.32 | -16.14 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.55 | -2.55 | -257% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement