Ad is loading...
BFZ vs MUC
BFZ vs MUC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFZ vs. MUC commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFZ is a Buy and MUC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUC has more net assets: 1.08B vs. BFZ (350M). MUC has a higher annual dividend yield than BFZ: MUC (0.021) vs BFZ (-3.120). BFZ was incepted earlier than MUC: BFZ (24 years) vs MUC (27 years). MUC (1.46) and BFZ (1.49) have comparable expense ratios . BFZ has a higher turnover MUC (59.00) vs MUC (59.00).
| BFZ | MUC | BFZ / MUC | |
| Gain YTD | -3.120 | 0.021 | -15,176% |
| Net Assets | 350M | 1.08B | 32% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Turnover | 65.00 | 59.00 | 110% |
| Yield | 3.45 | 3.94 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BFZ | MUC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 17 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...