Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCBX vs FHKCX
BGCBX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$6.29
Change-$0.04 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.86M
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
BGCBX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. BGCBX (2.86M). BGCBX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCBX (1.74) vs FHKCX (1.22). BGCBX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCBX (4 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). BGCBX (10.84) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCBX (25.00). BGCBX (0) and FHKCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BGCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.17 vs. FHKCX (33.87).
| BGCBX | FHKCX | BGCBX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 0.91 | 1,191% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.333 | 21.445 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.86M | 1.24B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.22 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.17 | 33.87 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.86 | 43.29 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 5.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement