Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCBX vs FHKCX
BGCBX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$7.13
Change+$0.04 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.21M
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.19
Change+$0.65 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
BGCBX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. BGCBX (3.21M). BGCBX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCBX (1.53) vs FHKCX (1.11). BGCBX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCBX (4 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). BGCBX (10.84) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCBX (25.00). BGCBX (0) and FHKCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BGCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.79 vs. FHKCX (47.44).
| BGCBX | FHKCX | BGCBX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 0.91 | 1,191% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.804 | 35.099 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.21M | 1.39B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.11 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.79 | 47.44 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.12 | 74.62 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 10.25 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.78 | - |