Ad is loading...
BGCBX vs FHKCX
BGCBX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$5.80
Change-$0.12 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99M
Fidelity China Region
Price$39.69
Change-$1.32 (-3.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
BGCBX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. BGCBX (2.99M). BGCBX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCBX (1.75) vs FHKCX (1.33). BGCBX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCBX (4 years) vs FHKCX (29 years). BGCBX (11.25) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCBX (14.00). BGCBX (0) and FHKCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BGCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.73 vs. FHKCX (21.40).
| BGCBX | FHKCX | BGCBX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 11.25 | 0.91 | 1,236% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.725 | 5.451 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.99M | 1.18B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.33 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.73 | 21.40 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.78 | 11.20 | -132% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 24.17 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...