Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCBX vs TRCLX
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$6.77
Change+$0.02 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.06M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.53
Change+$0.11 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.76M
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 59.8M vs. BGCBX (3.06M). BGCBX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: BGCBX (1.68) vs TRCLX (1.56). BGCBX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCBX (4 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). BGCBX (10.84) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCBX (25.00). BGCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: BGCBX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). BGCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.79 vs. TRCLX (42.32).
| BGCBX | TRCLX | BGCBX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.03 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 2.10 | 516% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.745 | 27.083 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06M | 59.8M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.56 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.79 | 42.32 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.56 | 15.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -3.73 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement