Ad is loading...
BGCBX vs TRCLX
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$5.80
Change-$0.12 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.10
Change-$0.22 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.5M
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 50.5M vs. BGCBX (2.99M). BGCBX (1.75) and TRCLX (1.68) have matching dividends . BGCBX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCBX (4 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). BGCBX (11.25) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCBX (14.00). BGCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: BGCBX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). BGCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.73 vs. TRCLX (11.03).
| BGCBX | TRCLX | BGCBX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.03 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 11.25 | 2.10 | 536% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.725 | 7.197 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.99M | 50.5M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.68 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.73 | 11.03 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.78 | -9.28 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 18.25 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...