Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCBX vs TRCLX
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$5.88
Change+$0.03 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.13M
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 44.1M vs. BGCBX (2.71M). BGCBX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: BGCBX (1.82) vs TRCLX (1.69). BGCBX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCBX (4 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). BGCBX (10.84) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCBX (25.00). BGCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: BGCBX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). BGCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.90 vs. TRCLX (5.69).
| BGCBX | TRCLX | BGCBX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.03 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 2.10 | 516% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.294 | 8.333 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71M | 44.1M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.69 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.90 | 5.69 | 385% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.44 | -5.14 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -1.56 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement