Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCBX vs TRCLX
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$7.13
Change+$0.04 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.21M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.68
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.35M
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.3M vs. BGCBX (3.21M). BGCBX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: BGCBX (1.53) vs TRCLX (1.39). BGCBX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCBX (4 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). BGCBX (10.84) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCBX (25.00). BGCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: BGCBX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). BGCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.61 vs. TRCLX (46.73).
| BGCBX | TRCLX | BGCBX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.03 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 2.10 | 516% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.020 | 28.977 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.21M | 62.3M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.39 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.61 | 46.73 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.39 | 22.60 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -2.43 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement