Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKCX
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71M
Fidelity China Region
Price$42.56
Change+$0.22 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. BGCDX (2.71M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCDX (1.87) vs FHKCX (1.32). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKCX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.89 vs. FHKCX (15.65).
| BGCDX | FHKCX | BGCDX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 0.91 | 1,181% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.460 | 8.871 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71M | 1.15B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.32 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.89 | 15.65 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.65 | 23.95 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 4.39 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement