Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKCX
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7M
Fidelity China Region
Price$44.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. BGCDX (2.7M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCDX (1.87) vs FHKCX (1.32). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKCX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.69 vs. FHKCX (21.90).
| BGCDX | FHKCX | BGCDX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 0.91 | 1,181% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.634 | 14.914 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7M | 1.15B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.32 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.69 | 21.90 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.61 | 28.31 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 6.97 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers