Ad is loading...
BGCDX vs FHKCX
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.98
Change-$0.19 (-3.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.11M
Fidelity China Region
Price$41.41
Change-$1.39 (-3.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. BGCDX (3.11M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCDX (1.83) vs FHKCX (1.31). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKCX (29 years). BGCDX (11.17) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (14.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKCX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.46 vs. FHKCX (30.28).
| BGCDX | FHKCX | BGCDX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 11.17 | 0.91 | 1,227% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.744 | 10.054 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11M | 1.17B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.31 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.46 | 30.28 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.79 | 27.99 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 21.60 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...