Ad is loading...
BGCDX vs FHKCX
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.35
Change-$0.13 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77M
Fidelity China Region
Price$36.92
Change-$0.87 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. BGCDX (2.77M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCDX (1.80) vs FHKCX (1.33). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKCX (29 years). BGCDX (11.17) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (14.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKCX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.53 vs. FHKCX (15.45).
| BGCDX | FHKCX | BGCDX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 11.17 | 0.91 | 1,227% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.697 | -2.828 | -166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77M | 1.18B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.33 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.53 | 15.45 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.25 | 10.17 | -130% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 4.26 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.18 | - |