Ad is loading...
BGCDX vs FHKCX
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.98
Change+$0.21 (+3.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.76M
Fidelity China Region
Price$42.18
Change+$1.33 (+3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. BGCDX (2.76M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCDX (1.89) vs FHKCX (1.39). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKCX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. FHKCX (13.04).
| BGCDX | FHKCX | BGCDX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 0.91 | 1,181% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.916 | 5.040 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.76M | 1.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.39 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.07 | 13.04 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.94 | 29.58 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 10.41 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers