Ad is loading...
BGCDX vs TRCLX
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.35
Change-$0.13 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.48
Change-$0.13 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.53M
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 40.5M vs. BGCDX (2.77M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: BGCDX (1.80) vs TRCLX (1.68). BGCDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCDX (4 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). BGCDX (11.17) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCDX (14.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: TRCLX (500000) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.53 vs. TRCLX (6.63).
| BGCDX | TRCLX | BGCDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.03 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 11.17 | 2.10 | 532% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.697 | 0.473 | 992% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 500000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77M | 40.5M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.68 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.53 | 6.63 | 355% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.25 | -9.86 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 3.86 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |