Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
BGCDX vs TRCLX
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.17
Change-$0.14 (-2.64%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.52
Change-$0.28 (-2.59%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 45.1M vs. BGCDX (2.65M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than BGCDX: TRCLX (2.49) vs BGCDX (1.65). BGCDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCDX (3 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.60 vs. BGCDX (14.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: TRCLX (500000) vs BGCDX (10000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. BGCDX (4.87).
| BGCDX | TRCLX | BGCDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.842 | 8.566 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 500000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65M | 45.1M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.49 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.87 | 5.44 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -40.79 | -38.25 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |