Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs TRCLX
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$6.97
Change-$0.04 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.16M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.67
Change-$0.15 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.48M
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. BGCDX (3.16M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: BGCDX (1.49) vs TRCLX (1.34). BGCDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCDX (4 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCDX (25.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: TRCLX (500000) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.96 vs. TRCLX (29.34).
| BGCDX | TRCLX | BGCDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.03 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 2.10 | 512% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.399 | 29.451 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 500000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.16M | 62.5M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.34 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.96 | 29.34 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 29.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -10.16 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement