Ad is loading...
BGCDX vs TRCLX
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.98
Change+$0.21 (+3.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.76M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.42
Change+$0.27 (+2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.71M
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 42.7M vs. BGCDX (2.76M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: BGCDX (1.89) vs TRCLX (1.71). BGCDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCDX (4 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCDX (25.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: TRCLX (500000) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. TRCLX (3.10).
| BGCDX | TRCLX | BGCDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.03 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 2.10 | 512% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.916 | 5.587 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 500000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.76M | 42.7M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.71 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.07 | 3.10 | 550% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.94 | 1.99 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 1.38 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...