Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs TRCLX
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.13M
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 44.1M vs. BGCDX (2.71M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: BGCDX (1.87) vs TRCLX (1.69). BGCDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCDX (4 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCDX (25.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: TRCLX (500000) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.89 vs. TRCLX (5.69).
| BGCDX | TRCLX | BGCDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.03 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 2.10 | 512% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.460 | 8.333 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 500000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71M | 44.1M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.69 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.89 | 5.69 | 385% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.65 | -5.14 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -1.56 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |