Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCSX vs RERBX
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BGCSX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap I
Price$15.80
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.63M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.79
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.85B
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BGCSX (253M). BGCSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BGCSX (2.92) vs RERBX (0.25). BGCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BGCSX (8 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BGCSX (0.67). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BGCSX (23.00). BGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: BGCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. BGCSX (5.02). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 10.04 vs. BGCSX (-8.38).
| BGCSX | RERBX | BGCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.616 | 17.581 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 0.25 | 1,187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.02 | 8.98 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.15 | 34.01 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.38 | 10.04 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement