Ad is loading...
BGCSX vs RERBX
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BGCSX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap I
Price$14.26
Change+$0.21 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.03M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$50.72
Change+$0.21 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.82B
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 120B vs. BGCSX (239M). BGCSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BGCSX (3.17) vs RERBX (0.48). BGCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BGCSX (8 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BGCSX (0.72). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCSX (16.00). BGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: BGCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). BGCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.56 vs. RERBX (-4.88). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.97 vs. BGCSX (3.56).
| BGCSX | RERBX | BGCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.56 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.56 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.143 | -0.256 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 120B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 0.48 | 655% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.56 | -4.88 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.46 | -1.40 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.56 | 16.97 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...