Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCSX vs RERBX
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BGCSX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap I
Price$16.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.97M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.75
Change+$0.51 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. BGCSX (261M). BGCSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BGCSX (2.87) vs RERBX (0.24). BGCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BGCSX (8 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BGCSX (0.67). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BGCSX (23.00). BGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: BGCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. BGCSX (4.06). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.50 vs. BGCSX (-8.59).
| BGCSX | RERBX | BGCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.752 | 21.436 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 0.24 | 1,208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | 10.29 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.65 | 42.45 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.59 | 13.50 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement