Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCSX vs RERBX
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BGCSX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap I
Price$15.46
Change-$0.09 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.9M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.87
Change-$0.25 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCSX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. BGCSX (250M). BGCSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BGCSX (2.86) vs RERBX (0.23). BGCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BGCSX (9 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BGCSX (0.67). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BGCSX (23.00). BGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: BGCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. BGCSX (8.16). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : -0.24 vs. BGCSX (-19.65).
| BGCSX | RERBX | BGCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.834 | 17.738 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 0.23 | 1,238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 11.81 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.39 | 28.30 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.65 | -0.24 | 8,217% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers