Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGFIX vs RGACX
BGFIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BGFIX vs RGACX
William Blair Growth I
Price$13.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.01M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.42
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.05B
BGFIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGFIX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGFIX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. BGFIX (243M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BGFIX: RGACX (0.07) vs BGFIX (0.00). BGFIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BGFIX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BGFIX (0.89). BGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGFIX: RGACX (250) vs BGFIX (500000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. BGFIX (-5.28). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.50 vs. BGFIX (6.49).
| BGFIX | RGACX | BGFIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.94 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.94 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.995 | 13.099 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 243M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.28 | 17.14 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.37 | 56.85 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.49 | 46.50 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.04 | 82.94 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement