Ad is loading...
BGFIX vs RGACX
BGFIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BGFIX vs RGACX
William Blair Growth I
Price$10.98
Change+$1.12 (+11.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.52M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$66.49
Change+$6.32 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
BGFIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGFIX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGFIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. BGFIX (186M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BGFIX: RGACX (0.09) vs BGFIX (0.00). BGFIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BGFIX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and BGFIX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . BGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGFIX: RGACX (250) vs BGFIX (500000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.54 vs. BGFIX (-30.02). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.35 vs. BGFIX (-4.09).
| BGFIX | RGACX | BGFIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.94 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.94 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -21.622 | -16.419 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186M | 246B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.02 | -12.54 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.36 | -4.11 | 617% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.09 | 34.35 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.83 | 36.41 | -96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...