Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGFIX vs RGACX
BGFIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BGFIX vs RGACX
William Blair Growth I
Price$12.36
Change-$0.19 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.35M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.52
Change-$0.91 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
BGFIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGFIX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGFIX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. BGFIX (228M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BGFIX: RGACX (0.08) vs BGFIX (0.00). BGFIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BGFIX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BGFIX (0.89). BGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGFIX: RGACX (250) vs BGFIX (500000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. BGFIX (-13.75). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.78 vs. BGFIX (5.73).
| BGFIX | RGACX | BGFIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.94 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.94 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.749 | 4.903 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 228M | 310B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.75 | 6.70 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.16 | 51.90 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.73 | 46.78 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.88 | 69.68 | -26% |