It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSPWH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPWH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BGFV (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +32.39% price change this week, while SPWH (@Specialty Stores) price change was +5.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.26%.
BGFV is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
SPWH is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
BGFV | SPWH | BGFV / SPWH | |
Capitalization | 80.3M | 116M | 69% |
EBITDA | 8.18M | 48.4M | 17% |
Gain YTD | -62.248 | -39.202 | 159% |
P/E Ratio | 29.84 | 45.87 | 65% |
Revenue | 885M | 1.32B | 67% |
Total Cash | 9.2M | 2.89M | 318% |
Total Debt | 277M | 550M | 50% |
BGFV | SPWH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGFV's Valuation (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPWH (67). This means that BGFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPWH’s over the last 12 months.
BGFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SPWH (100). This means that BGFV’s stock grew similarly to SPWH’s over the last 12 months.
SPWH's SMR Rating (92) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BGFV (95). This means that SPWH’s stock grew similarly to BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
SPWH's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BGFV (64). This means that SPWH’s stock grew similarly to BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
SPWH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BGFV (2). This means that SPWH’s stock grew similarly to BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
BGFV | SPWH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago52% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 8 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago81% | 6 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGFV has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGFV jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGFV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BGFV | 100% | +26.63% | ||
HNST - BGFV | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
LE - BGFV | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
CPRT - BGFV | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
SPWH - BGFV | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
ASO - BGFV | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPWH has been loosely correlated with LE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPWH jumps, then LE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPWH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPWH | 100% | -1.52% | ||
LE - SPWH | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
HNST - SPWH | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
CPRT - SPWH | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
BGFV - SPWH | 34% Loosely correlated | +26.63% | ||
CWH - SPWH | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More |