BGKKF
Price
$3.83
Change
+$0.23 (+6.39%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
Capitalization
7.3B
CFBK
Price
$22.85
Change
+$0.54 (+2.42%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
126.64M
23 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGKKF vs CFBK

Header iconBGKKF vs CFBK Comparison
Open Charts BGKKF vs CFBKBanner chart's image
Bangkok Bank Public
Price$3.83
Change+$0.23 (+6.39%)
Volume$1.45K
Capitalization7.3B
CF Bankshares
Price$22.85
Change+$0.54 (+2.42%)
Volume$73.83K
Capitalization126.64M
BGKKF vs CFBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGKKF vs. CFBK commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGKKF is a Hold and CFBK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BGKKF: $3.83 vs. CFBK: $22.85)
Brand notoriety: BGKKF and CFBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGKKF: 100% vs. CFBK: 238%
Market capitalization -- BGKKF: $7.3B vs. CFBK: $126.64M
BGKKF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.3B. CFBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $126.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGKKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCFBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BGKKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CFBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFBK is a better buy in the long-term than BGKKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CFBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BGKKF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CFBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGKKF($7.3B) has a higher market cap than CFBK($127M). CFBK has higher P/E ratio than BGKKF: CFBK (7.45) vs BGKKF (6.02). BGKKF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CFBK (-10.246). CFBK has less debt than BGKKF: CFBK (130M) vs BGKKF (519B). BGKKF has higher revenues than CFBK: BGKKF (180B) vs CFBK (52M).
BGKKFCFBKBGKKF / CFBK
Capitalization7.3B127M5,746%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-10.246-
P/E Ratio6.027.4581%
Revenue180B52M346,154%
Total CashN/A232M-
Total Debt519B130M399,231%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFBK: Fundamental Ratings
CFBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGKKFCFBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETLAX14.490.09
+0.63%
Eventide Large Cap Focus A
LAFSX19.220.12
+0.63%
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
HUMDX17.480.08
+0.46%
Huber Mid Cap Value Inv
GABUX5.070.02
+0.40%
Gabelli Utilities AAA
LVAQX19.040.07
+0.37%
LSV Small Cap Value Investor

BGKKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BGKKF and FRFC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGKKF and FRFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGKKF
1D Price
Change %
BGKKF100%
N/A
FRFC - BGKKF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFBK - BGKKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
CAIXY - BGKKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
ISDAY - BGKKF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTTW - BGKKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
+2.42%
HBAN - CFBK
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
SFST - CFBK
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
FMNB - CFBK
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
RF - CFBK
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
LSBK - CFBK
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More