BGL
Price
$10.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8, 12:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
328.38M
BURCF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGL vs BURCF

Header iconBGL vs BURCF Comparison
Open Charts BGL vs BURCFBanner chart's image
Blue Gold
Price$10.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization328.38M
Basin Uranium
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.57K
Capitalization2.07M
BGL vs BURCF Comparison Chart in %
BGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BURCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGL vs. BURCF commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGL is a Hold and BURCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BGL: $10.75 vs. BURCF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: BGL and BURCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGL: 125% vs. BURCF: 40%
Market capitalization -- BGL: $328.38M vs. BURCF: $2.07M
BGL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $328.38M. BURCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $111.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBURCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BURCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BGL and BURCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BURCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BURCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGL is a better buy in the short-term than BURCF.

Price Growth

BGL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +15.84% price change this week, while BURCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2329.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.82% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGL($328M) has a higher market cap than BURCF($2.07M). BGL YTD gains are higher at: -12.566 vs. BURCF (-36.917).
BGLBURCFBGL / BURCF
Capitalization328M2.07M15,838%
EBITDAN/A-1.74M-
Gain YTD-12.566-36.91734%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A667K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGLBURCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BURCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBSNY37.372.39
+6.83%
VEND MARKETPLACES ASA
APRAF0.30N/A
N/A
Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.
BCLYF5.14N/A
N/A
Barclays Plc
CKNHF48.10N/A
N/A
Clarkson Horace Plc
PRMY25.00N/A
N/A
Primary Bk

BGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BGL and DC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGL and DC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGL
1D Price
Change %
BGL100%
+8.48%
DC - BGL
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
NFGC - BGL
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
AAUC - BGL
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
AUST - BGL
-4%
Poorly correlated
+8.82%
NAMM - BGL
-5%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
More

BURCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BURCF and NAMM have been poorly correlated (+-5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BURCF and NAMM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BURCF
1D Price
Change %
BURCF100%
N/A
NAMM - BURCF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
AAUC - BURCF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
BGL - BURCF
-9%
Poorly correlated
+8.48%