BGL
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.63 (-5.42%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
337.23M
NAMM
Price
$2.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
157.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGL vs NAMM

Header iconBGL vs NAMM Comparison
Open Charts BGL vs NAMMBanner chart's image
Blue Gold
Price$11.00
Change-$0.63 (-5.42%)
Volume$400
Capitalization337.23M
Namib Minerals
Price$2.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization157.27M
BGL vs NAMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGL vs. NAMM commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGL is a Hold and NAMM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BGL: $11.04 vs. NAMM: $2.93)
Brand notoriety: BGL and NAMM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGL: 27% vs. NAMM: 26%
Market capitalization -- BGL: $337.23M vs. NAMM: $157.27M
BGL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $337.23M. NAMM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $157.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $78.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNAMM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NAMM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGL is a better buy in the long-term than NAMM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAMM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAMM is a better buy in the short-term than BGL.

Price Growth

BGL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.81% price change this week, while NAMM (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4664.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGL($337M) has a higher market cap than NAMM($157M). BGL YTD gains are higher at: -5.409 vs. NAMM (-72.332).
BGLNAMMBGL / NAMM
Capitalization337M157M215%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.409-72.3327%
P/E RatioN/A43.83-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGLNAMM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
1%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
25%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PNGAY14.530.23
+1.61%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China Ltd.
HLOC0.16N/A
N/A
Helo Corp.
RATIY45.18N/A
N/A
Rational AG
LMPMF0.28N/A
N/A
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
BKUT507.00N/A
N/A
Bank of Utica (NY)

BGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BGL and DC have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGL and DC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGL
1D Price
Change %
BGL100%
+0.17%
DC - BGL
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
NFGC - BGL
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
AAUC - BGL
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
AUST - BGL
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
NAMM - BGL
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

NAMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAMM and AUST have been poorly correlated (+-1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAMM and AUST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAMM
1D Price
Change %
NAMM100%
+0.34%
AUST - NAMM
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
DC - NAMM
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
AU - NAMM
-4%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
NFGC - NAMM
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
BGL - NAMM
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More