Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.17
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.68M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$23.88
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.28M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Buy and CSUZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. BGLAX (187M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.42) vs BGLAX (1.46). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.48 vs. CSUZX (6.53). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 37.24 vs. BGLAX (34.09).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.221 | 5.368 | 135% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 187M | 924M | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.48 | 6.53 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.26 | 16.12 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.09 | 37.24 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.81 | 60.01 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement