Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.87
Change+$0.17 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.9M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$25.43
Change+$0.25 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets961.1M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Buy and CSUZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 961M vs. BGLAX (136M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.31) vs BGLAX (1.52). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. CSUZX (2.73). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 43.34 vs. BGLAX (38.64).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.870 | 12.207 | 105% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136M | 961M | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 2.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 2.73 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.44 | 28.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.64 | 43.34 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.83 | 76.88 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers