Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.71
Change+$0.12 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.68M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$24.82
Change+$0.14 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.44M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Aug 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Hold and CSUZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. BGLAX (136M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.41) vs BGLAX (1.47). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. CSUZX (5.24). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.55 vs. BGLAX (35.48).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.307 | 9.515 | 119% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136M | 935M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 2.41 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | 5.24 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.87 | 13.19 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.48 | 39.55 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.91 | 80.73 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement