Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.87
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.25M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$25.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets994.35M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Hold and CSUZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 994M vs. BGLAX (134M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.31) vs BGLAX (1.52). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. CSUZX (2.86). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 38.36 vs. BGLAX (34.18).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.870 | 12.030 | 107% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 994M | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 2.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 2.86 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.87 | 33.58 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.18 | 38.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.26 | 74.65 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement