Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.35
Change+$0.09 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.29M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$24.21
Change+$0.12 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.28M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Buy and CSUZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. BGLAX (196M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.41) vs BGLAX (1.47). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. CSUZX (4.12). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 35.71 vs. BGLAX (32.83).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.583 | 6.824 | 126% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 196M | 924M | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 2.41 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 4.12 | 279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 11.63 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 35.71 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.52 | 63.63 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement