Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLCX vs CSUZX
BGLCX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLCX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureC
Price$14.46
Change-$0.10 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.09M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$25.12
Change-$0.18 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.84M
BGLCX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLCX vs. CSUZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLCX is a Hold and CSUZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. BGLCX (133M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLCX: CSUZX (2.33) vs BGLCX (0.82). BGLCX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLCX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLCX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLCX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLCX (1000). BGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. CSUZX (2.65). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. BGLCX (23.93).
| BGLCX | CSUZX | BGLCX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.87 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.87 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.445 | 10.839 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133M | 971M | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 2.33 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.65 | 2.65 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.31 | 21.60 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.93 | 33.18 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.34 | 77.81 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers