Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLUX vs NPFCX
BGLUX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts BGLUX vs NPFCX
Baron Global Opportunity R6
Price$47.67
Change-$0.31 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets665.59M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.54
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
BGLUX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLUX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLUX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. BGLUX (666M). BGLUX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . BGLUX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: BGLUX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than BGLUX (0.96). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BGLUX (8.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLUX: NPFCX (250) vs BGLUX (5000000). BGLUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.70 vs. NPFCX (11.85). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.52 vs. BGLUX (0.56).
| BGLUX | NPFCX | BGLUX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.48 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.674 | 18.169 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.70 | 11.85 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.99 | 59.20 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.56 | 29.52 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement