Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLUX vs NPFCX
BGLUX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts BGLUX vs NPFCX
Baron Global Advantage R6
Price$45.57
Change+$0.22 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets623.42M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
BGLUX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLUX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLUX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. BGLUX (623M). BGLUX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . BGLUX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: BGLUX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than BGLUX (0.96). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BGLUX (8.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLUX: NPFCX (250) vs BGLUX (5000000). BGLUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.52 vs. NPFCX (15.84). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.06 vs. BGLUX (11.50).
| BGLUX | NPFCX | BGLUX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.48 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.411 | 14.180 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 623M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.52 | 15.84 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.17 | 41.93 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.50 | 37.06 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement