Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLUX vs NPFCX
BGLUX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts BGLUX vs NPFCX
Baron Global Opportunity R6
Price$46.29
Change+$0.20 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets638.47M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$67.01
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
BGLUX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLUX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLUX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. BGLUX (638M). BGLUX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . BGLUX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: BGLUX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than BGLUX (0.96). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BGLUX (8.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLUX: NPFCX (250) vs BGLUX (5000000). BGLUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.18 vs. NPFCX (10.60). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.04 vs. BGLUX (-2.82).
| BGLUX | NPFCX | BGLUX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.48 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.216 | 15.734 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 638M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.18 | 10.60 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.75 | 43.13 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.82 | 22.04 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement