Ad is loading...
BGLUX vs NPFCX
BGLUX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts BGLUX vs NPFCX
Baron Global Advantage R6
Price$37.43
Change+$1.05 (+2.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.79M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$55.75
Change+$0.86 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.87B
BGLUX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLUX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLUX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BGLUX (510M). BGLUX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . BGLUX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: BGLUX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than BGLUX (0.95). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BGLUX (2.03). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLUX: NPFCX (250) vs BGLUX (5000000). BGLUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.85 vs. NPFCX (-0.34). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. BGLUX (18.14).
| BGLUX | NPFCX | BGLUX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.48 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.896 | -5.199 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.85 | -0.34 | -4,306% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.93 | 5.46 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.14 | 36.91 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...