BGMS
Price
$5.34
Change
+$0.62 (+13.14%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.87M
RNAC
Price
$10.20
Change
+$0.46 (+4.72%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
253.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGMS vs RNAC

Header iconBGMS vs RNAC Comparison
Open Charts BGMS vs RNACBanner chart's image
Bio Green Med Solution
Price$5.34
Change+$0.62 (+13.14%)
Volume$3.44K
Capitalization13.87M
Cartesian Therapeutics
Price$10.20
Change+$0.46 (+4.72%)
Volume$4.84K
Capitalization253.26M
BGMS vs RNAC Comparison Chart in %
BGMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RNAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGMS vs. RNAC commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGMS is a Hold and RNAC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BGMS: $4.72 vs. RNAC: $9.74)
Brand notoriety: BGMS and RNAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGMS: 26% vs. RNAC: 153%
Market capitalization -- BGMS: $13.87M vs. RNAC: $253.26M
BGMS [@Biotechnology] is valued at $13.87M. RNAC’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $253.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $105.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRNAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BGMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RNAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BGMS and RNAC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNAC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RNAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BGMS and RNAC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BGMS (@Biotechnology) experienced а -4.45% price change this week, while RNAC (@Biotechnology) price change was -4.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +9.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +87.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+9.11% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNAC($253M) has a higher market cap than BGMS($13.9M). BGMS YTD gains are higher at: 1155.319 vs. RNAC (-45.617).
BGMSRNACBGMS / RNAC
Capitalization13.9M253M5%
EBITDAN/A-118.73M-
Gain YTD1155.319-45.617-2,533%
P/E RatioN/A1.98-
RevenueN/A1.03M-
Total CashN/A160M-
Total DebtN/A13.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGMS vs RNAC: Fundamental Ratings
BGMS
RNAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3486
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGMS's Valuation (70) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as RNAC (99). This means that BGMS’s stock grew similarly to RNAC’s over the last 12 months.

BGMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as RNAC (100). This means that BGMS’s stock grew similarly to RNAC’s over the last 12 months.

BGMS's SMR Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as RNAC (100). This means that BGMS’s stock grew similarly to RNAC’s over the last 12 months.

BGMS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNAC (86). This means that BGMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNAC’s over the last 12 months.

RNAC's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGMS (100). This means that RNAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGMSRNAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RNAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGNT0.040.01
+30.78%
Totaligent Inc.
ANSNF0.070.01
+14.38%
Anson Resources
AKAAF80.75N/A
N/A
Aker AS
WTSHF18.32N/A
N/A
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp.
BEIGF15.95N/A
N/A
BeOne Medicines Ltd.

BGMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGMS has been loosely correlated with MIRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGMS jumps, then MIRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGMS
1D Price
Change %
BGMS100%
+3.28%
MIRM - BGMS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
BRNS - BGMS
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
ORMP - BGMS
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
IMMP - BGMS
27%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
RNAC - BGMS
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
More