Ad is loading...
BGPKX vs RERBX
BGPKX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BGPKX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford Developed EAFE All Cap K
Price$12.10
Change+$0.75 (+6.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.13M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$48.88
Change+$2.32 (+4.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.84B
BGPKX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGPKX vs. RERBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGPKX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BGPKX (192M). BGPKX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BGPKX (1.82) vs RERBX (0.48). BGPKX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BGPKX (8 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BGPKX (0.63). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGPKX (15.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGPKX: RERBX (250) vs BGPKX (10000000). BGPKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.07 vs. RERBX (-16.02). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.82 vs. BGPKX (8.54).
| BGPKX | RERBX | BGPKX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.56 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.56 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.873 | -8.437 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 192M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 0.48 | 377% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.07 | -16.02 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.05 | -11.42 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.54 | 9.82 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -4.85 | - |