BGR | IXC | BGR / IXC | |
Gain YTD | 11.337 | 7.264 | 156% |
Net Assets | 354M | 1.77B | 20% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.41 | 337% |
Turnover | 42.00 | 8.00 | 525% |
Yield | 2.46 | 3.93 | 63% |
Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
BGR | IXC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 3 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 3 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago82% | 11 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BGR and CVX have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGR and CVX's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXC has been closely correlated with FANG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXC jumps, then FANG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IXC | 100% | -0.40% | ||
FANG - IXC | 89% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
SHEL - IXC | 88% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
XOM - IXC | 88% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
COP - IXC | 87% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
DVN - IXC | 85% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More |