BGS
Price
$4.71
Change
+$0.18 (+3.96%)
Updated
Jul 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
899.46M
8 days until earnings call
CAG
Price
$19.63
Change
+$0.23 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jul 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.17B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGS vs CAG

Header iconBGS vs CAG Comparison
Open Charts BGS vs CAGBanner chart's image
B&G Foods
Price$4.71
Change+$0.18 (+3.96%)
Volume$28.73K
Capitalization899.46M
Conagra Brands
Price$19.63
Change+$0.23 (+1.19%)
Volume$68.83K
Capitalization14.17B
BGS vs CAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. CAG commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a StrongBuy and CAG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BGS: $4.07 vs. CAG: $18.75)
Brand notoriety: BGS and CAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 67% vs. CAG: 152%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $899.46M vs. CAG: $14.17B
BGS [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $899.46M. CAG’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $14.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCAG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAG is a better buy in the long-term than BGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the short-term than CAG.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

CAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.83% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAG($14.2B) has a higher market cap than BGS($899M). BGS has higher P/E ratio than CAG: BGS (25.71) vs CAG (14.48). CAG YTD gains are higher at: -30.508 vs. BGS (-36.441). CAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88B vs. BGS (173M). CAG has more cash in the bank: 61.5M vs. BGS (41.1M). BGS has less debt than CAG: BGS (2.12B) vs CAG (9.07B). CAG has higher revenues than BGS: CAG (12.2B) vs BGS (2.06B).
BGSCAGBGS / CAG
Capitalization899M14.2B6%
EBITDA173M1.88B9%
Gain YTD-36.441-30.508119%
P/E Ratio25.7114.48178%
Revenue2.06B12.2B17%
Total Cash41.1M61.5M67%
Total Debt2.12B9.07B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs CAG: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
CAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1252
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9065
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CAG (12). This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CAG (100). This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's SMR Rating (58) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (96). This means that CAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as BGS (90). This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAG (99). This means that BGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSCAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCIFX15.290.05
+0.33%
Green Century MSCI Intl Indx Instl
DEMRX26.380.02
+0.08%
Macquarie Emerging Markets R
RPEAX40.30-0.09
-0.22%
Davis Opportunity A
NEQIX12.97-0.05
-0.38%
Neuberger Berman U.S. Equity Impact I
NWHZX75.82-0.56
-0.73%
Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Gr A

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
N/A
HAIN - BGS
63%
Loosely correlated
+9.03%
RKDA - BGS
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
GIS - BGS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
CAG - BGS
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
CPB - BGS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More

CAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAG
1D Price
Change %
CAG100%
-1.68%
GIS - CAG
79%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
CPB - CAG
72%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
KHC - CAG
67%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
FLO - CAG
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
MKC - CAG
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
More