BGS
Price
$4.46
Change
-$0.01 (-0.22%)
Updated
May 9, 12:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
899.46M
83 days until earnings call
GIS
Price
$54.85
Change
+$0.14 (+0.26%)
Updated
May 9, 02:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
39.5B
47 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGS vs GIS

Header iconBGS vs GIS Comparison
Open Charts BGS vs GISBanner chart's image
B&G Foods
Price$4.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.22%)
Volume$1.19K
Capitalization899.46M
General Mills
Price$54.85
Change+$0.14 (+0.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization39.5B
BGS vs GIS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GIS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. GIS commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Buy and GIS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BGS: $4.48 vs. GIS: $54.71)
Brand notoriety: BGS: Not notable vs. GIS: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 309% vs. GIS: 65%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $899.46M vs. GIS: $39.5B
BGS [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $899.46M. GIS’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $39.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGIS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GIS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GIS is a better buy in the long-term than BGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GIS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GIS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GIS is a better buy in the short-term than BGS.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -34.21% price change this week, while GIS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

GIS is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.98% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GIS($39.5B) has a higher market cap than BGS($899M). BGS has higher P/E ratio than GIS: BGS (25.71) vs GIS (16.08). GIS YTD gains are higher at: -12.450 vs. BGS (-33.060). GIS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.68B vs. BGS (173M). GIS has more cash in the bank: 589M vs. BGS (41.1M). BGS has less debt than GIS: BGS (2.12B) vs GIS (12.5B). GIS has higher revenues than BGS: GIS (20.2B) vs BGS (2.06B).
BGSGISBGS / GIS
Capitalization899M39.5B2%
EBITDA173M4.68B4%
Gain YTD-33.060-12.450266%
P/E Ratio25.7116.08160%
Revenue2.06B20.2B10%
Total Cash41.1M589M7%
Total Debt2.12B12.5B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs GIS: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
GIS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
9336
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4776
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (2) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as GIS (21). This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to GIS’s over the last 12 months.

GIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as BGS (100). This means that GIS’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

GIS's SMR Rating (36) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (93). This means that GIS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

GIS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as BGS (90). This means that GIS’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as GIS (76). This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to GIS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSGIS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GIS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIMDX15.37N/A
N/A
Clarkston Founders Institutional
ABYSX19.69N/A
N/A
AB Discovery Value Advisor
CCIZX130.65N/A
N/A
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
MSGQX15.77N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars C
NWXSX9.91N/A
N/A
Nationwide International Sm Cp A

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with RKDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then RKDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
-5.08%
RKDA - BGS
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
HLF - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.95%
KHC - BGS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
HAIN - BGS
32%
Poorly correlated
+6.21%
GIS - BGS
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More