BGS
Price
$6.58
Change
-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
899.46M
38 days until earnings call
NATR
Price
$12.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
392.19M
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGS vs NATR

Header iconBGS vs NATR Comparison
Open Charts BGS vs NATRBanner chart's image
B&G Foods
Price$6.58
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization899.46M
Nature's Sunshine Products
Price$12.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30
Capitalization392.19M
BGS vs NATR Comparison Chart
Loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. NATR commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Hold and NATR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BGS: $6.59 vs. NATR: $12.07)
Brand notoriety: BGS and NATR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 106% vs. NATR: 175%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $899.46M vs. NATR: $392.19M
BGS [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $899.46M. NATR’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $392.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNATR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NATR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the long-term than NATR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NATR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the short-term than NATR.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +3.11% price change this week, while NATR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

NATR is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.37% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGS($899M) has a higher market cap than NATR($392M). NATR has higher P/E ratio than BGS: NATR (27.06) vs BGS (25.71). BGS YTD gains are higher at: -1.532 vs. NATR (-17.667). BGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 173M vs. NATR (32.1M). NATR has more cash in the bank: 82.4M vs. BGS (41.1M). NATR has less debt than BGS: NATR (14.9M) vs BGS (2.12B). BGS has higher revenues than NATR: BGS (2.06B) vs NATR (445M).
BGSNATRBGS / NATR
Capitalization899M392M229%
EBITDA173M32.1M539%
Gain YTD-1.532-17.6679%
P/E Ratio25.7127.0695%
Revenue2.06B445M463%
Total Cash41.1M82.4M50%
Total Debt2.12B14.9M14,215%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs NATR: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
NATR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7761
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9784
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6081
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4428
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for NATR (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew significantly faster than NATR’s over the last 12 months.

NATR's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

NATR's SMR Rating (84) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (97) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NATR (81) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to NATR’s over the last 12 months.

NATR's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (44) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSNATR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSDCX22.17N/A
N/A
DWS Small Cap Growth C
FFBFX26.08N/A
N/A
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd Inv
VRVIX324.33N/A
N/A
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index I
MMCRX16.44N/A
N/A
Madison Mid Cap R6
HWVAX11.36N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val A

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with RKDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then RKDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
-2.08%
RKDA - BGS
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.76%
HLF - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
KHC - BGS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
HAIN - BGS
31%
Poorly correlated
-7.16%
CENTA - BGS
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
More

NATR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NATR and USNA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NATR and USNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATR
1D Price
Change %
NATR100%
-2.58%
USNA - NATR
30%
Poorly correlated
-6.19%
CENTA - NATR
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
BGS - NATR
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
THS - NATR
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
CENT - NATR
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.44%
More