BGS
Price
$11.07
Change
-$0.03 (-0.27%)
Updated
May 1, 6:59 PM EST
7 days until earnings call
NOMD
Price
$18.03
Change
-$0.03 (-0.17%)
Updated
May 1, 6:59 PM EST
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions BGS vs NOMD

Header iconBGS vs NOMD Comparison
Open Charts BGS vs NOMDBanner chart's image
B&G Foods
Price$11.07
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
Volume$257.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Nomad Foods
Price$18.03
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
Volume$577.62K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BGS vs NOMD Comparison Chart

Loading...

BGSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
NOMDDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BGS vs. NOMD commentary
May 02, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Buy and NOMD is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2024
Stock price -- (BGS: $11.10 vs. NOMD: $18.06)
Brand notoriety: BGS and NOMD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 78% vs. NOMD: 82%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $899.46M vs. NOMD: $3.21B
BGS [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $899.46M. NOMD’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $8.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BGS and NOMD are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOMD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NOMD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the short-term than NOMD.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while NOMD (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

NOMD is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.15% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BGS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for NOMD with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOMD($3.21B) has a higher market cap than BGS($899M). BGS has higher P/E ratio than NOMD: BGS (25.71) vs NOMD (16.07). BGS (7.522) and NOMD (7.474) have similar YTD gains . NOMD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 480M vs. BGS (173M). NOMD has more cash in the bank: 413M vs. BGS (41.1M). BGS (2.12B) and NOMD (2.15B) have identical debt. NOMD has higher revenues than BGS: NOMD (3.04B) vs BGS (2.06B).
BGSNOMDBGS / NOMD
Capitalization899M3.21B28%
EBITDA173M480M36%
Gain YTD7.5227.474101%
P/E Ratio25.7116.07160%
Revenue2.06B3.04B68%
Total Cash41.1M413M10%
Total Debt2.12B2.15B99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs NOMD: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
NOMD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9280
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5232
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (4) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOMD (53) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NOMD (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

NOMD's SMR Rating (80) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (92) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NOMD (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

NOMD's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (52) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSNOMD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
NOMDDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAOSX21.59-0.11
-0.51%
Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity P
WRAAX12.36-0.07
-0.56%
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities A
AEMRX10.04-0.13
-1.28%
American Century Emerging Markets R
TASMX29.17-0.47
-1.59%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value R6
DOXWX15.41-0.26
-1.66%
Dodge & Cox Global Stock X

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with RKDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then RKDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
-1.25%
RKDA - BGS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
CAG - BGS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
BYND - BGS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
THS - BGS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
HAIN - BGS
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
More

NOMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOMD and SJM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOMD and SJM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOMD
1D Price
Change %
NOMD100%
-2.17%
SJM - NOMD
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
BGS - NOMD
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
CAG - NOMD
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
K - NOMD
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
INGR - NOMD
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More