Advertisement
BGS vs NOMD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Hold and NOMD is a Hold.
BGS | NOMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NOMD (6) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NOMD (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's SMR Rating (83) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (94) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (84) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (36) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
| BGS | NOMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 55% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NOMD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NOMD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOMD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NOMD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BGS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while NOMD (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
BGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
NOMD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-3.69% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AFMC | 40.08 | 0.47 | +1.18% |
| First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) | |||
| DFUV | 55.19 | 0.19 | +0.35% |
| Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) | |||
| MYMI | 23.90 | 0.05 | +0.19% |
| State Street My2029 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMI) | |||
| CLOZ | 26.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) | |||
| ECNS | 27.63 | -0.10 | -0.36% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) | |||
BGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS | 100% | +2.09% | ||
| HAIN - BGS | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.63% | ||
| HLF - BGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| HSY - BGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| MDLZ - BGS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| NOMD - BGS | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.65% | ||
More | ||||
NOMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOMD has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOMD jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOMD | 100% | +4.65% | ||
| MDLZ - NOMD | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| KHC - NOMD | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| GIS - NOMD | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| CAG - NOMD | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| MKC - NOMD | 38% Loosely correlated | -4.87% | ||
More | ||||