Analysis and predictions INGR vs NOMD
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGR is a Hold and NOMD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INGR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- INGR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NOMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INGR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOMD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INGR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NOMD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
INGR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while NOMD (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
INGR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2024.
NOMD is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.15% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| INGR | NOMD | INGR / NOMD | |
| Capitalization | 7.69B | 3.21B | 239% |
| EBITDA | 1.17B | 480M | 244% |
| Gain YTD | 6.286 | 7.474 | 84% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.21 | 16.07 | 76% |
| Revenue | 8.16B | 3.04B | 268% |
| Total Cash | 409M | 413M | 99% |
| Total Debt | 2.4B | 2.15B | 112% |
INGR | NOMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INGR's Valuation (28) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as NOMD (53) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOMD (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew significantly faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's SMR Rating (50) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as NOMD (80) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as NOMD (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INGR (74) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than INGR’s over the last 12 months.
| INGR | NOMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FGTNX | 20.32 | -0.21 | -1.02% |
| Fidelity Advisor Global Equity Inc C | |||
| FDEGX | 60.80 | -1.01 | -1.63% |
| Fidelity Growth Strategies | |||
| NAESX | 102.36 | -2.01 | -1.93% |
| Vanguard Small Cap Index Inv | |||
| VCSLX | 14.43 | -0.31 | -2.10% |
| VALIC Company I Small Cap Index | |||
| MFLLX | 11.13 | -0.30 | -2.62% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Inception R6 | |||
INGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with THS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then THS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INGR | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| THS - INGR | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| K - INGR | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| SMPL - INGR | 39% Loosely correlated | +6.42% | ||
| CAG - INGR | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MDLZ - INGR | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||
NOMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NOMD and SJM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOMD and SJM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOMD | 100% | -2.17% | ||
| SJM - NOMD | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BGS - NOMD | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| CAG - NOMD | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| K - NOMD | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| INGR - NOMD | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||