BGUUF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
65.8M
BONXF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
31.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGUUF vs BONXF

Header iconBGUUF vs BONXF Comparison
Open Charts BGUUF vs BONXFBanner chart's image
Benguet Corp. BC
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.53K
Capitalization65.8M
Bonterra Resources
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$139.4K
Capitalization31.24M
BGUUF vs BONXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BGUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGUUF vs. BONXF commentary
Oct 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGUUF is a Hold and BONXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BGUUF: $0.04 vs. BONXF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: BGUUF and BONXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGUUF: 19% vs. BONXF: 114%
Market capitalization -- BGUUF: $65.8M vs. BONXF: $31.24M
BGUUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $65.8M. BONXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $31.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $110.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGUUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBONXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BGUUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BONXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BGUUF and BONXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGUUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BONXF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGUUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BONXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BONXF is a better buy in the short-term than BGUUF.

Price Growth

BGUUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BONXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6155.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGUUF($65.8M) has a higher market cap than BONXF($31.2M). BGUUF YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. BONXF (-7.215). BGUUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. BONXF (-8.42M). BGUUF has more cash in the bank: 3.1B vs. BONXF (8.49M). BGUUF has higher revenues than BONXF: BGUUF (3.01B) vs BONXF (0).
BGUUFBONXFBGUUF / BONXF
Capitalization65.8M31.2M211%
EBITDA1.12B-8.42M-13,353%
Gain YTD100.000-7.215-1,386%
P/E Ratio2.22N/A-
Revenue3.01B0-
Total Cash3.1B8.49M36,578%
Total Debt14.4MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGUUF vs BONXF: Fundamental Ratings
BGUUF
BONXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9168
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGUUF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BONXF (49). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BONXF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BONXF (100). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to BONXF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as BONXF (98). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to BONXF’s over the last 12 months.

BONXF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BGUUF (65). This means that BONXF’s stock grew similarly to BGUUF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as BONXF (100). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to BONXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGUUFBONXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OVATF0.01N/A
N/A
Ovation Science Inc.
CCOJF12.88N/A
N/A
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Inc.
GYYMF2.00N/A
N/A
Gym Group PLC.
SMORF1.25N/A
N/A
Smoore International Holdings Ltd.
MDVT37.28-0.09
-0.24%
Middlebury National Corp.

BGUUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BGUUF and BRGC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGUUF and BRGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGUUF
1D Price
Change %
BGUUF100%
N/A
BRGC - BGUUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BONXF - BGUUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
BLAGF - BGUUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%

BONXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BONXF and FNV have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BONXF and FNV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BONXF
1D Price
Change %
BONXF100%
-1.05%
FNV - BONXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
PAAS - BONXF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
WDOFF - BONXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
OR - BONXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
VGZ - BONXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
More