Advertisement
BHAT vs GDC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHAT is a Hold and GDC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHAT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGDC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BHAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GDC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GDC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BHAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GDC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
BHAT (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а -17.24% price change this week, while GDC (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -12.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -4.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.51%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliances (-4.93% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| BHAT | GDC | BHAT / GDC | |
| Capitalization | 44.3M | 222M | 20% |
| EBITDA | -26.04M | -9.18M | 284% |
| Gain YTD | -91.273 | 105.291 | -87% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 40.5M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.12M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.26M | 1.36M | 239% |
BHAT | GDC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BHAT's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as GDC (57). This means that BHAT’s stock grew similarly to GDC’s over the last 12 months.
BHAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GDC (100). This means that BHAT’s stock grew similarly to GDC’s over the last 12 months.
BHAT's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as GDC (98). This means that BHAT’s stock grew similarly to GDC’s over the last 12 months.
GDC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHAT (91). This means that GDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHAT’s over the last 12 months.
GDC's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as BHAT (97). This means that GDC’s stock grew similarly to BHAT’s over the last 12 months.
| BHAT | GDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
BHAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BHAT and AMWL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHAT and AMWL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHAT | 100% | -5.51% | ||
| AMWL - BHAT | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.82% | ||
| ASFT - BHAT | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CERT - BHAT | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.08% | ||
| FRGT - BHAT | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.56% | ||
| EVTC - BHAT | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||
GDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDC has been loosely correlated with PINC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDC jumps, then PINC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDC | 100% | -6.73% | ||
| PINC - GDC | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MAPS - GDC | 37% Loosely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| ANY - GDC | 33% Loosely correlated | -4.26% | ||
| CLSK - GDC | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.31% | ||
| RBLX - GDC | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.82% | ||
More | ||||