BHAT
Price
$1.72
Change
+$0.02 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
61.32M
TAPM
Price
$0.36
Change
+$0.02 (+5.88%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHAT vs TAPM

Header iconBHAT vs TAPM Comparison
Open Charts BHAT vs TAPMBanner chart's image
Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology
Price$1.72
Change+$0.02 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization61.32M
Tapinator
Price$0.36
Change+$0.02 (+5.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.05M
BHAT vs TAPM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHAT vs. TAPM commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHAT is a StrongBuy and TAPM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BHAT: $1.70 vs. TAPM: $0.36)
Brand notoriety: BHAT and TAPM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHAT: 20% vs. TAPM: 2%
Market capitalization -- BHAT: $61.32M vs. TAPM: $2.05M
BHAT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $61.32M. TAPM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAPM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TAPM is a better buy in the long-term than BHAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHAT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAPM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TAPM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BHAT and TAPM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BHAT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.59% price change this week, while TAPM (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHAT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

TAPM is expected to report earnings on Mar 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.13% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHAT($61.3M) has a higher market cap than TAPM($2.05M). TAPM YTD gains are higher at: -31.198 vs. BHAT (-87.636). TAPM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.74M vs. BHAT (-57.15M). TAPM has more cash in the bank: 260K vs. BHAT (136K). TAPM has less debt than BHAT: TAPM (129K) vs BHAT (1.54M). BHAT has higher revenues than TAPM: BHAT (15.2M) vs TAPM (3.55M).
BHATTAPMBHAT / TAPM
Capitalization61.3M2.05M2,996%
EBITDA-57.15M-1.74M3,286%
Gain YTD-87.636-31.198281%
P/E Ratio1.15N/A-
Revenue15.2M3.55M429%
Total Cash136K260K52%
Total Debt1.54M129K1,192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHAT vs TAPM: Fundamental Ratings
BHAT
TAPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
974
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6586
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
986
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHAT's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAPM (86). This means that BHAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAPM’s over the last 12 months.

BHAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TAPM (100). This means that BHAT’s stock grew similarly to TAPM’s over the last 12 months.

TAPM's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHAT (97). This means that TAPM’s stock grew significantly faster than BHAT’s over the last 12 months.

BHAT's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as TAPM (86). This means that BHAT’s stock grew similarly to TAPM’s over the last 12 months.

TAPM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHAT (98). This means that TAPM’s stock grew significantly faster than BHAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHATTAPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDGMF0.14N/A
+3.01%
RIDGELINE MINERALS CORP.
LWCL38.10N/A
N/A
Lewis & Clark BANCORP
MNOIY21.95N/A
N/A
Mandarin Oriental International Ltd.
SKSBF23.30N/A
N/A
Skanska AB
TRUX78.45-1.05
-1.32%
Truxton Corp

BHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHAT and GDC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHAT and GDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHAT
1D Price
Change %
BHAT100%
-2.30%
GDC - BHAT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
AMWL - BHAT
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
ASFT - BHAT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CERT - BHAT
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
EVTC - BHAT
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
More

TAPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAPM and LOQPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAPM and LOQPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAPM
1D Price
Change %
TAPM100%
+7.85%
LOQPF - TAPM
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPLT - TAPM
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
TREIF - TAPM
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
BHAT - TAPM
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
STLFF - TAPM
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More