Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs JNGLX
BHCFX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. JNGLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. BHCFX (147M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than BHCFX: JNGLX (0.31) vs BHCFX (0.00). BHCFX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: BHCFX (8 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). BHCFX (1.18) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). BHCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: BHCFX (2000) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. BHCFX (7.31). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.25 vs. JNGLX (17.76).
| BHCFX | JNGLX | BHCFX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.80 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.80 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.101 | 20.695 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 4.95B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | 11.18 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.83 | 26.94 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.25 | 17.76 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers