Ad is loading...
BHCFX vs JNGLX
BHCFX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. JNGLX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. BHCFX (183M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than BHCFX: JNGLX (0.34) vs BHCFX (0.21). BHCFX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: BHCFX (7 years) vs JNGLX (26 years). BHCFX (1.20) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.83 vs. JNGLX (35.00). BHCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: BHCFX (2000) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.07 vs. BHCFX (-12.95). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.88 vs. JNGLX (26.01).
| BHCFX | JNGLX | BHCFX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.80 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.80 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.953 | -6.908 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183M | 4.95B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.34 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.95 | -12.07 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.37 | -4.53 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.88 | 26.01 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.22 | - |