Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs JNGLX
BHCFX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. JNGLX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.4B vs. BHCFX (141M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than BHCFX: JNGLX (0.36) vs BHCFX (0.22). BHCFX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: BHCFX (7 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). BHCFX (1.18) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). BHCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: BHCFX (2000) vs JNGLX (2500). BHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.66 vs. JNGLX (-14.11). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.26 vs. JNGLX (5.37).
| BHCFX | JNGLX | BHCFX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.80 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.80 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.951 | -0.957 | 726% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 4.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.66 | -14.11 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.82 | 9.24 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.26 | 5.37 | 340% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers