Ad is loading...
BHCFX vs SHSAX
BHCFX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. SHSAX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.6B vs. BHCFX (183M). SHSAX (0.21) and BHCFX (0.21) have matching dividends . BHCFX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: BHCFX (7 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). BHCFX (1.20) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.83 vs. SHSAX (27.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: SHSAX (1000) vs BHCFX (2000). SHSAX (-12.54) and BHCFX (-12.95) have marching annual gain over last year. BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.88 vs. SHSAX (8.29).
| BHCFX | SHSAX | BHCFX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.09 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.09 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.953 | -4.308 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183M | 6.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.21 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.95 | -12.54 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.37 | -15.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.88 | 8.29 | 626% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers