Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. BHCUX (131M). BHCUX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCUX (0.51) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCUX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). BHCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.48 vs. FSPHX (-15.25). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 13.83 vs. FSPHX (-13.73).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.865 | -2.202 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131M | 5.88B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.02 | 2,990% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.48 | -15.25 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.73 | 3.92 | 300% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.83 | -13.73 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement