Ad is loading...
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 26, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. BHCUX (218M). BHCUX (0.00) and FSPHX (0.00) have matching dividends . BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (7 years) vs FSPHX (43 years). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.83 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. BHCUX (4.33). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 51.79 vs. FSPHX (4.02).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.183 | 3.095 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 7.51B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.33 | 5.18 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.28 | -8.43 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.79 | 4.02 | 1,290% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...