Ad is loading...
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.78B vs. BHCUX (193M). BHCUX (0.00) and FSPHX (0.00) have matching dividends . BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.83 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). BHCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.47 vs. FSPHX (-0.47). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 57.68 vs. FSPHX (2.70).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.039 | 5.688 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 193M | 6.78B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | -0.47 | -958% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.20 | 2.91 | 350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.68 | 2.70 | 2,140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers