Ad is loading...
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. BHCUX (170M). BHCUX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCUX (0.50) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCUX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.83 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). BHCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.81 vs. FSPHX (-10.70). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 38.14 vs. FSPHX (-9.48).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.65 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.65 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.545 | -8.257 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 6.42B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.02 | 3,010% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.81 | -10.70 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.69 | -11.68 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.14 | -9.48 | -402% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers