Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. BHCUX (139M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCUX: FSPHX (0.02) vs BHCUX (0.00). BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCUX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). BHCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.60 vs. FSPHX (-10.18). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 14.79 vs. FSPHX (-14.11).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.756 | 4.110 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139M | 5.96B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.60 | -10.18 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.31 | 9.43 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | -14.11 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement