Ad is loading...
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.74B vs. BHCUX (183M). BHCUX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCUX (0.48) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCUX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.83 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). BHCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.69 vs. FSPHX (-12.25). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 68.79 vs. FSPHX (12.76).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.65 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.65 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.273 | -2.606 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183M | 6.74B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.02 | 2,955% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.69 | -12.25 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.83 | -2.59 | -187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.79 | 12.76 | 539% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers