Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. BHCUX (141M). BHCUX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCUX (0.53) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCUX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). BHCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.70 vs. FSPHX (-13.58). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 18.78 vs. FSPHX (-16.93).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.805 | -5.064 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 5.92B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.02 | 2,998% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.70 | -13.58 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.48 | -5.81 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.78 | -16.93 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers