BHF
Price
$47.35
Change
-$0.07 (-0.15%)
Updated
Sep 22, 6:59 PM EST
43 days until earnings call
MFC
Price
$18.93
Change
-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Updated
Sep 22, 6:59 PM EST
45 days until earnings call

BHF vs MFC ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconBHF vs MFC Comparison
Open Charts BHF vs MFCBanner chart's image
Brighthouse Financial
Price$47.35
Change-$0.07 (-0.15%)
Volume$365.54K
CapitalizationN/A
Manulife Financial
Price$18.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Volume$1.54M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BHF vs MFC Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
BHF vs. MFC commentary
Sep 24, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHF is a StrongSell and MFC is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2023
Stock price -- (BHF: $47.35 vs. MFC: $18.94)
Brand notoriety: BHF and MFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHF: 169% vs. MFC: 95%
Market capitalization -- BHF: $3.1B vs. MFC: $34.54B
BHF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.1B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $34.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $20.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHF is a better buy in the long-term than MFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHF is a better buy in the short-term than MFC.

Price Growth

BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -8.77% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2023.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 08, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.98% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BHF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MFC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($34.5B) has a higher market cap than BHF($3.1B). BHF has higher P/E ratio than MFC: BHF (4.80) vs MFC (3.81). MFC YTD gains are higher at: 6.166 vs. BHF (-7.646). BHF has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. MFC (21B). BHF has less debt than MFC: BHF (3.16B) vs MFC (12.8B). MFC has higher revenues than BHF: MFC (28.9B) vs BHF (4.17B).
BHFMFCBHF / MFC
Capitalization3.1B34.5B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.6466.166-124%
P/E Ratio4.803.81126%
Revenue4.17B28.9B14%
Total Cash82.4B21B392%
Total Debt3.16B12.8B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHF vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
BHF
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7460
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3083
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHF's Valuation (70) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (77). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (74). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

BHF's SMR Rating (98) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (100). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (47). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

BHF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFC (83). This means that BHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASTL6.780.07
+1.04%
Algoma Steel Group
LPLA241.152.28
+0.95%
LPL Financial Holdings
RCMT20.170.10
+0.50%
RCM Technologies
FENG1.11N/A
-0.01%
Phoenix New Media Limited
BNL14.86-0.20
-1.33%
Broadstone Net Lease

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHF has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHF jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
-0.15%
PRU - BHF
85%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
MET - BHF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
PRI - BHF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
CNO - BHF
76%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
MFC - BHF
71%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
More

MFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFC
1D Price
Change %
MFC100%
-0.05%
PRU - MFC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
PUK - MFC
72%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
BHF - MFC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
AFL - MFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
CNO - MFC
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
More