It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHIL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNITO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHIL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NITO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BHIL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -5.86% price change this week, while NITO (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -1.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.24%.
BHIL is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.
NITO is expected to report earnings on Nov 29, 2023.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
BHIL | NITO | BHIL / NITO | |
Capitalization | 45.8M | 3.87M | 1,183% |
EBITDA | -54.77M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 5.704 | -88.983 | -6% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.07 | - |
Revenue | 473M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 48.7M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 146M | N/A | - |
NITO | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BHIL | NITO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago74% | 4 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BHIL and NTR have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHIL and NTR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHIL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BHIL | 100% | -0.31% | ||
NTR - BHIL | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
BIOX - BHIL | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.78% | ||
IPI - BHIL | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ICL - BHIL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
SEED - BHIL | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.92% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NITO and MULG have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NITO and MULG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NITO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NITO | 100% | -4.24% | ||
MULG - NITO | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BHIL - NITO | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
NTR - NITO | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
CBLUF - NITO | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MOS - NITO | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
More |