Advertisement
BHP vs CLLXF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Hold and CLLXF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLLXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLLXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BHP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CLLXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.44% price change this week, while CLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
BHP is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| BHP | CLLXF | BHP / CLLXF | |
| Capitalization | 139B | 10.1M | 1,376,238% |
| EBITDA | 28B | -937.39K | -2,987,020% |
| Gain YTD | 13.127 | -16.174 | -81% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.08 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 53.6B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 9.86B | 130K | 7,583,077% |
| Total Debt | 20.2B | 40K | 50,500,000% |
BHP | CLLXF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 40 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BHP's Valuation (6) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLXF (97) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.
BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.
CLLXF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (98) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CLLXF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.
BHP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as CLLXF (76) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.
CLLXF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHP (88) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CLLXF’s stock grew significantly faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.
| BHP | CLLXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 88% |
Advertisement
CLLXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLXF and GSM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLXF and GSM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLLXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLLXF | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| GSM - CLLXF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
| TECK - CLLXF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| SOUHY - CLLXF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
| BHP - CLLXF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
| RIO - CLLXF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||