Advertisement
BHP vs EFV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Hold and EFV is a Hold.
BHP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BHP | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 67% | 18 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 85% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while .
- BHP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BHP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.01% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
BHP is expected to report earnings on Oct 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-0.85% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLUD | 24.95 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) | |||
| QYLG | 29.93 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) | |||
| SLYG | 109.08 | -0.19 | -0.17% |
| State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) | |||
| IFED | 46.16 | -0.84 | -1.78% |
| ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN due September 15, 2061 (IFED) | |||
| FIGG | 18.02 | -1.16 | -6.05% |
| Leverage Shares 2x Long FIG Daily ETF (FIGG) | |||
BHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| RIO - BHP | 89% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| VALE - BHP | 74% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| USAS - BHP | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| WRN - BHP | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| SKE - BHP | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
More | ||||
EFV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.