BHP
Price
$49.16
Change
-$0.18 (-0.36%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
146.11B
88 days until earnings call
FSUMF
Price
$10.85
Change
+$0.15 (+1.40%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
45.07B
96 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs FSUMF

Header iconBHP vs FSUMF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs FSUMFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$49.16
Change-$0.18 (-0.36%)
Volume$16.25K
Capitalization146.11B
FORTESCUE
Price$10.85
Change+$0.15 (+1.40%)
Volume$10.05K
Capitalization45.07B
BHP vs FSUMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. FSUMF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Buy and FSUMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BHP: $49.34 vs. FSUMF: $10.85)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. FSUMF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 53% vs. FSUMF: 149%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $146.11B vs. FSUMF: $45.07B
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $146.11B. FSUMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $45.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSUMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than FSUMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BHP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.21% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($146B) has a higher market cap than FSUMF($45.1B). BHP has higher P/E ratio than FSUMF: BHP (20.02) vs FSUMF (7.66). BHP YTD gains are higher at: 3.078 vs. FSUMF (-5.652). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.6B vs. FSUMF (9.99B). BHP has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. FSUMF (5.22B). FSUMF has less debt than BHP: FSUMF (6.1B) vs BHP (22.4B). BHP has higher revenues than FSUMF: BHP (55.3B) vs FSUMF (17B).
BHPFSUMFBHP / FSUMF
Capitalization146B45.1B324%
EBITDA22.6B9.99B226%
Gain YTD3.078-5.652-54%
P/E Ratio20.027.66262%
Revenue55.3B17B325%
Total Cash10.6B5.22B203%
Total Debt22.4B6.1B367%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs FSUMF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
FSUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6675
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3871
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9463
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUMF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (5) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSUMF (71) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's SMR Rating (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as FSUMF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as FSUMF (60) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (94) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICOP27.540.12
+0.44%
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
GTEK33.06-0.40
-1.20%
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF
MDIV15.67-0.24
-1.53%
Multi-Asset Diversified Income ETF
DES30.90-0.89
-2.81%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Dividend ETF
WEED10.94-0.38
-3.32%
Roundhill Cannabis ETF

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been closely correlated with FSUGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then FSUGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
+1.43%
FSUGY - FSUMF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
RIO - FSUMF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
BHP - FSUMF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
VALE - FSUMF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
FCX - FSUMF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More