BHP
Price
$54.39
Change
-$1.16 (-2.09%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
138.28B
44 days until earnings call
FSUMF
Price
$12.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
38.02B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs FSUMF

Header iconBHP vs FSUMF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs FSUMFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$54.39
Change-$1.16 (-2.09%)
Volume$3.27M
Capitalization138.28B
FORTESCUE
Price$12.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization38.02B
BHP vs FSUMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. FSUMF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Hold and FSUMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BHP: $54.39 vs. FSUMF: $12.65)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. FSUMF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 108% vs. FSUMF: 30%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $138.28B vs. FSUMF: $38.02B
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $138.28B. FSUMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $38.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSUMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BHP and FSUMF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSUMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BHP and FSUMF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($138B) has a higher market cap than FSUMF($38B). BHP has higher P/E ratio than FSUMF: BHP (15.33) vs FSUMF (11.53). BHP YTD gains are higher at: 16.137 vs. FSUMF (10.000). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. FSUMF (10.5B). BHP has more cash in the bank: 7.21B vs. FSUMF (4.9B). FSUMF has less debt than BHP: FSUMF (5.4B) vs BHP (24.5B). BHP has higher revenues than FSUMF: BHP (51.3B) vs FSUMF (18.1B).
BHPFSUMFBHP / FSUMF
Capitalization138B38B363%
EBITDA25.8B10.5B246%
Gain YTD16.13710.000161%
P/E Ratio15.3311.53133%
Revenue51.3B18.1B283%
Total Cash7.21B4.9B147%
Total Debt24.5B5.4B454%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs FSUMF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
FSUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
9966
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUMF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (6) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSUMF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (48) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHP (62) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPFSUMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWO310.831.71
+0.55%
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
FDD15.990.03
+0.16%
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Income Fund
KAPR33.890.04
+0.12%
Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
GAEM26.51N/A
N/A
Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF
DIVP25.39-0.17
-0.68%
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been closely correlated with FSUGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then FSUGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
N/A
FSUGY - FSUMF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
RIO - FSUMF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
BHP - FSUMF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
VALE - FSUMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
TECK - FSUMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
More