BHP
Price
$52.86
Change
+$0.75 (+1.44%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
133.15B
7 days until earnings call
MJDLF
Price
$6.39
Change
-$0.19 (-2.89%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
524.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs MJDLF

Header iconBHP vs MJDLF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs MJDLFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$52.86
Change+$0.75 (+1.44%)
Volume$2.18M
Capitalization133.15B
Major Drilling Group International
Price$6.39
Change-$0.19 (-2.89%)
Volume$6.74K
Capitalization524.1M
BHP vs MJDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. MJDLF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Hold and MJDLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BHP: $52.86 vs. MJDLF: $6.39)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. MJDLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 70% vs. MJDLF: 31%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $133.15B vs. MJDLF: $524.1M
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $133.15B. MJDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $524.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMJDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than MJDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJDLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than MJDLF.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.32% price change this week, while MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +105.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.55% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($133B) has a higher market cap than MJDLF($524M). MJDLF has higher P/E ratio than BHP: MJDLF (27.42) vs BHP (11.79). MJDLF YTD gains are higher at: 12.898 vs. BHP (10.432). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 28B vs. MJDLF (103M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 9.86B vs. MJDLF (46M). MJDLF has less debt than BHP: MJDLF (37.1M) vs BHP (20.2B). BHP has higher revenues than MJDLF: BHP (53.6B) vs MJDLF (728M).
BHPMJDLFBHP / MJDLF
Capitalization133B524M25,382%
EBITDA28B103M27,184%
Gain YTD10.43212.89881%
P/E Ratio11.7927.4243%
Revenue53.6B728M7,363%
Total Cash9.86B46M21,430%
Total Debt20.2B37.1M54,447%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs MJDLF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
MJDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4863
SMR RATING
1..100
9984
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
899
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (6) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for MJDLF (77) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MJDLF (63) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MJDLF (55) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHP (89) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MJDLF’s stock grew significantly faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPMJDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRACX49.610.44
+0.89%
Putnam Research C
FDCAX46.280.30
+0.65%
Fidelity Capital Appreciation
BIIEX26.000.11
+0.42%
Brandes International Equity I
MPEMX9.03-0.01
-0.11%
Mondrian Emerging Markets Value Equity
PHPPX12.93-0.13
-1.00%
Principal MidCap Growth R5

BHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHP
1D Price
Change %
BHP100%
+1.44%
RIO - BHP
89%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
VALE - BHP
80%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
GLNCY - BHP
74%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
FSUGY - BHP
73%
Closely correlated
+2.76%
TECK - BHP
72%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
More

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
N/A
IVPAF - MJDLF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
TECK - MJDLF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
BHP - MJDLF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
GSM - MJDLF
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
FSUGY - MJDLF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
More