BHP
Price
$54.74
Change
-$0.95 (-1.71%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
141.2B
23 days until earnings call
NBYCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
10M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs NBYCF

Header iconBHP vs NBYCF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs NBYCFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$54.74
Change-$0.95 (-1.71%)
Volume$3.04M
Capitalization141.2B
Niobay Metals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$34.16K
Capitalization10M
BHP vs NBYCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. NBYCF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a StrongBuy and NBYCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BHP: $54.74 vs. NBYCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. NBYCF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 108% vs. NBYCF: 86%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $141.2B vs. NBYCF: $10M
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $141.2B. NBYCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBYCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than NBYCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBYCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NBYCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than NBYCF.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.99% price change this week, while NBYCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +21.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +320.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($141B) has a higher market cap than NBYCF($10M). NBYCF YTD gains are higher at: 93.716 vs. BHP (16.884). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. NBYCF (-2.9M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. NBYCF (1.35M). BHP has higher revenues than NBYCF: BHP (51.3B) vs NBYCF (0).
BHPNBYCFBHP / NBYCF
Capitalization141B10M1,410,282%
EBITDA25.8B-2.9M-890,589%
Gain YTD16.88493.71618%
P/E Ratio15.43N/A-
Revenue51.3B0-
Total Cash12B1.35M888,889%
Total Debt24.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs NBYCF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
NBYCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6870
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6650
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (6) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBYCF (78) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (53) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (66) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPNBYCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OABI1.610.05
+3.21%
OmniAb
OSCR18.420.33
+1.82%
Oscar Health
CNI92.880.48
+0.52%
Canadian National Railway
KBDC13.830.04
+0.29%
Kayne Anderson BDC Inc.
BOF2.15N/A
N/A
BranchOut Food

NBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBYCF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBYCF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBYCF
1D Price
Change %
NBYCF100%
+14.91%
RIO - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
BHP - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
VALE - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
AABB - NBYCF
11%
Poorly correlated
-9.00%
NICLF - NBYCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More