BHP
Price
$54.39
Change
-$1.16 (-2.09%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
138.28B
44 days until earnings call
NBYCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs NBYCF

Header iconBHP vs NBYCF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs NBYCFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$54.39
Change-$1.16 (-2.09%)
Volume$3.27M
Capitalization138.28B
Niobay Metals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$39.43K
Capitalization6.72M
BHP vs NBYCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. NBYCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Hold and NBYCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BHP: $54.39 vs. NBYCF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. NBYCF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 108% vs. NBYCF: 127%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $138.28B vs. NBYCF: $6.72M
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $138.28B. NBYCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBYCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than NBYCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBYCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NBYCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than NBYCF.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while NBYCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($138B) has a higher market cap than NBYCF($6.72M). NBYCF YTD gains are higher at: 36.612 vs. BHP (16.137). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. NBYCF (-2.81M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 7.21B vs. NBYCF (2.27M). BHP has higher revenues than NBYCF: BHP (51.3B) vs NBYCF (0).
BHPNBYCFBHP / NBYCF
Capitalization138B6.72M2,055,101%
EBITDA25.8B-2.81M-918,219%
Gain YTD16.13736.61244%
P/E Ratio15.33N/A-
Revenue51.3B0-
Total Cash7.21B2.27M318,146%
Total Debt24.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs NBYCF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
NBYCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7919
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6256
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (6) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBYCF (77) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as NBYCF (49) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (62) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPNBYCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRCC1.530.02
+1.32%
BRC
AVXL9.400.04
+0.43%
Anavex Life Sciences Corp
A128.750.27
+0.21%
Agilent Technologies
AGO82.18-0.86
-1.04%
Assured Guaranty Ltd
SCNX0.89-0.04
-4.64%
Scienture Holdings Inc

NBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBYCF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBYCF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBYCF
1D Price
Change %
NBYCF100%
-3.66%
RIO - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
BHP - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
VALE - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
AABB - NBYCF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.47%
NBRFF - NBYCF
8%
Poorly correlated
+15.37%
More