BHP
Price
$49.40
Change
-$1.60 (-3.14%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
60 days until earnings call
NBYCF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BHP vs NBYCF

Header iconBHP vs NBYCF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs NBYCFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$49.40
Change-$1.60 (-3.14%)
Volume$2.56M
CapitalizationN/A
Niobay Metals
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$2.32K
CapitalizationN/A
BHP vs NBYCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. NBYCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Buy and NBYCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BHP: $49.40 vs. NBYCF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. NBYCF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 117% vs. NBYCF: 26%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $146.11B vs. NBYCF: $5.3M
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $146.11B. NBYCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNBYCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NBYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than NBYCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBYCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NBYCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than NBYCF.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.77% price change this week, while NBYCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -11.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.03% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($146B) has a higher market cap than NBYCF($5.3M). NBYCF has higher P/E ratio than BHP: NBYCF (34.84) vs BHP (20.02). BHP YTD gains are higher at: -23.757 vs. NBYCF (-32.963). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.6B vs. NBYCF (-4.43M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NBYCF (4M). NBYCF has less debt than BHP: NBYCF (48.2K) vs BHP (22.4B). BHP has higher revenues than NBYCF: BHP (55.3B) vs NBYCF (0).
BHPNBYCFBHP / NBYCF
Capitalization146B5.3M2,753,159%
EBITDA22.6B-4.43M-510,257%
Gain YTD-23.757-32.96372%
P/E Ratio20.0234.8457%
Revenue55.3B0-
Total Cash10.6B4M264,801%
Total Debt22.4B48.2K46,473,029%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs NBYCF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
NBYCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6983
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33100
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7390
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (4) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBYCF (75) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBYCF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as NBYCF (90) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (60) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPNBYCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIEIX29.32-0.50
-1.68%
abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Class I
ALVIX9.98-0.23
-2.25%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val Inv
PEQSX34.31-0.83
-2.36%
Putnam Large Cap Value R6
JIJAX13.07-0.42
-3.11%
JHancock International Dynamic Gr A
FNRAX30.75-1.02
-3.21%
Franklin Natural Resources Adv

BHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHP
1D Price
Change %
BHP100%
-3.14%
RIO - BHP
88%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
FCX - BHP
81%
Closely correlated
-4.70%
VALE - BHP
79%
Closely correlated
-4.90%
GLNCY - BHP
74%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
HBM - BHP
74%
Closely correlated
-6.22%
More

NBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBYCF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBYCF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBYCF
1D Price
Change %
NBYCF100%
+5.37%
RIO - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
BHP - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
FLMMF - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
SCCO - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.91%
VALE - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.90%
More