BHSIF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.71M
LMSQF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
6.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHSIF vs LMSQF

Header iconBHSIF vs LMSQF Comparison
Open Charts BHSIF vs LMSQFBanner chart's image
Bayhorse Silver
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40.8K
Capitalization4.71M
Latin Metals
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.3K
Capitalization6.74M
BHSIF vs LMSQF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHSIF vs. LMSQF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSIF is a Hold and LMSQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BHSIF: $0.03 vs. LMSQF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: BHSIF and LMSQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHSIF: 14% vs. LMSQF: 61%
Market capitalization -- BHSIF: $4.71M vs. LMSQF: $6.74M
BHSIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.71M. LMSQF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHSIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMSQF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHSIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMSQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LMSQF is a better buy in the long-term than BHSIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHSIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BHSIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BHSIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while LMSQF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.21% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMSQF($6.74M) has a higher market cap than BHSIF($4.71M). LMSQF YTD gains are higher at: 49.378 vs. BHSIF (-47.016). LMSQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -892.32K vs. BHSIF (-2.37M). LMSQF has more cash in the bank: 546K vs. BHSIF (87.2K). LMSQF has less debt than BHSIF: LMSQF (65.8K) vs BHSIF (453K). BHSIF (0) and LMSQF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BHSIFLMSQFBHSIF / LMSQF
Capitalization4.71M6.74M70%
EBITDA-2.37M-892.32K266%
Gain YTD-47.01649.378-95%
P/E RatioN/A16.53-
Revenue00-
Total Cash87.2K546K16%
Total Debt453K65.8K688%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHSIF vs LMSQF: Fundamental Ratings
BHSIF
LMSQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10076
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMSQF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (94). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (100). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (100). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHSIF (91). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (100). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHSIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIAFX41.75N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Inv
TILCX23.62N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Va I
TGWRX13.16N/A
N/A
Transamerica Large Growth R
VWIAX61.17N/A
N/A
Vanguard Wellesley® Income Admiral™
APITX12.69N/A
N/A
Yorktown Growth L

BHSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHSIF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHSIF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHSIF
1D Price
Change %
BHSIF100%
-3.19%
DCNNF - BHSIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
NEXA - BHSIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
LITOF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
MARIF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
NVLHF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More

LMSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMSQF and LYSCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMSQF and LYSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMSQF
1D Price
Change %
LMSQF100%
N/A
LYSCF - LMSQF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
KVLQF - LMSQF
13%
Poorly correlated
+9.22%
LEMIF - LMSQF
8%
Poorly correlated
+9.52%
BHSIF - LMSQF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
KGHPF - LMSQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More