BHST
Price
$8.77
Change
-$0.43 (-4.67%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
180.26M
LW
Price
$62.90
Change
+$0.76 (+1.22%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.66B
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHST vs LW

Header iconBHST vs LW Comparison
Open Charts BHST vs LWBanner chart's image
Bioharvest Sciences
Price$8.77
Change-$0.43 (-4.67%)
Volume$130.39K
Capitalization180.26M
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$62.90
Change+$0.76 (+1.22%)
Volume$2.41M
Capitalization8.66B
BHST vs LW Comparison Chart in %
BHST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHST vs. LW commentary
Oct 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHST is a Hold and LW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BHST: $8.77 vs. LW: $62.90)
Brand notoriety: BHST and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHST: 332% vs. LW: 140%
Market capitalization -- BHST: $180.26M vs. LW: $8.66B
BHST [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $180.26M. LW’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $8.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than BHST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHST’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than BHST.

Price Growth

BHST (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -19.47% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +13.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +290.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.84% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($8.66B) has a higher market cap than BHST($180M). BHST YTD gains are higher at: 41.909 vs. LW (-4.013). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.07B vs. BHST (-7.05M). LW has more cash in the bank: 70.7M vs. BHST (3.73M). BHST has less debt than LW: BHST (21.1M) vs LW (4.16B). LW has higher revenues than BHST: LW (6.45B) vs BHST (30.2M).
BHSTLWBHST / LW
Capitalization180M8.66B2%
EBITDA-7.05M1.07B-1%
Gain YTD41.909-4.013-1,044%
P/E RatioN/A29.88-
Revenue30.2M6.45B0%
Total Cash3.73M70.7M5%
Total Debt21.1M4.16B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHST vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
BHST
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
792
SMR RATING
1..100
10045
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1009
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHST (94) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHST’s over the last 12 months.

BHST's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (92) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BHST’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (45) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHST (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHST’s over the last 12 months.

BHST's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BHST’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHST (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew significantly faster than BHST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHSTLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLBEX38.900.05
+0.13%
American Funds American Balanced R4
PIUCX24.67N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes International Equity C
IRGIX10.44N/A
N/A
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate I
GGCIX137.73N/A
N/A
Gabelli Growth I
SVFFX82.84N/A
N/A
Smead Value I1

BHST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHST and WEST have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHST and WEST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHST
1D Price
Change %
BHST100%
-4.67%
WEST - BHST
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
LW - BHST
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
ABVE - BHST
6%
Poorly correlated
+14.01%
COOT - BHST
1%
Poorly correlated
-10.61%
KHC - BHST
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+1.22%
FLO - LW
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
KHC - LW
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
CAG - LW
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
GIS - LW
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
CPB - LW
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More