Ad is loading...
BHYSX vs FQTIX
BHYSX vs FQTIX Comparison
Open Charts BHYSX vs FQTIX
BlackRock High Yield Port Svc
Price$6.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.01B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I Adv
Price$7.79
Change+$0.02 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.82M
BHYSX vs FQTIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHYSX vs. FQTIX commentary
Apr 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHYSX is a Buy and FQTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHYSX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. FQTIX (502M). FQTIX pays higher dividends than BHYSX: FQTIX (7.98) vs BHYSX (6.71). BHYSX was incepted earlier than FQTIX: BHYSX (26 years) vs FQTIX (6 years). BHYSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FQTIX (0.09). BHYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FQTIX (16.69). FQTIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHYSX: FQTIX (0) vs BHYSX (5000). FQTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.99 vs. BHYSX (7.23). FQTIX (32.25) and BHYSX (32.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BHYSX | FQTIX | BHYSX / FQTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.09 | 967% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.544 | -0.380 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25B | 502M | 4,980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.71 | 7.98 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 8.99 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.56 | 9.89 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.17 | 32.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.25 | N/A | - |