Ad is loading...
BHYSX vs FQTIX
BHYSX vs FQTIX Comparison
Open Charts BHYSX vs FQTIX
BlackRock High Yield Port Svc
Price$7.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.32B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I Adv
Price$7.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.35M
BHYSX vs FQTIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHYSX vs. FQTIX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHYSX is a Buy and FQTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHYSX has more cash in the bank: 26.3B vs. FQTIX (530M). FQTIX pays higher dividends than BHYSX: FQTIX (7.98) vs BHYSX (6.69). BHYSX was incepted earlier than FQTIX: BHYSX (27 years) vs FQTIX (6 years). BHYSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FQTIX (0.09). BHYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FQTIX (16.69). FQTIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHYSX: FQTIX (0) vs BHYSX (5000). FQTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. BHYSX (8.24). FQTIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.93 vs. BHYSX (38.06).
| BHYSX | FQTIX | BHYSX / FQTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.09 | 967% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.298 | 2.724 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.3B | 530M | 4,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.69 | 7.98 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 9.94 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.36 | 20.85 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.06 | 41.93 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.95 | N/A | - |