Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAGX vs GFACX
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIAGX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity I
Price$17.70
Change+$0.12 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets629.26M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.24
Change-$0.11 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.7B
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAGX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAGX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 326B vs. BIAGX (629M). BIAGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIAGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIAGX (26 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BIAGX (0.84). BIAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). BIAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BIAGX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. BIAGX (-39.90). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.66 vs. BIAGX (-41.14).
| BIAGX | GFACX | BIAGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.416 | 11.904 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 629M | 326B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -39.90 | 10.52 | -379% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.63 | 53.28 | -48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.14 | 36.66 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.09 | 64.44 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement