Ad is loading...
BIAGX vs GFACX
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIAGX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity I
Price$14.79
Change+$0.20 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets577.03M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAGX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAGX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. BIAGX (577M). BIAGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIAGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIAGX (26 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BIAGX (0.84). BIAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). BIAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BIAGX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. BIAGX (-48.88). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. BIAGX (-39.61).
| BIAGX | GFACX | BIAGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.683 | -9.959 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 577M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -48.88 | -7.10 | 688% |
| Returns for 3 years | -47.48 | 2.19 | -2,169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.61 | 37.34 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.06 | 35.37 | -79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...