Ad is loading...
BIAGX vs GFACX
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIAGX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity I
Price$16.62
Change-$0.33 (-1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708.8M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAGX vs. GFACX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAGX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. BIAGX (709M). BIAGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIAGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIAGX (26 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BIAGX (21.00). BIAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BIAGX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. BIAGX (-41.06). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. BIAGX (-40.19).
| BIAGX | GFACX | BIAGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.605 | 2.980 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 709M | 304B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -41.06 | 10.15 | -405% |
| Returns for 3 years | -39.89 | 17.69 | -225% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.19 | 32.83 | -122% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.48 | 55.63 | -31% |