Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIALX vs NPFCX
BIALX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts BIALX vs NPFCX
Brown Advisory Global Leaders Investor
Price$30.28
Change-$0.24 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.69
Change-$0.39 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
BIALX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIALX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIALX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. BIALX (2.53B). BIALX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: BIALX (0.32) vs NPFCX (0.00). BIALX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: BIALX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than BIALX (0.91). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BIALX (15.00). BIALX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: BIALX (100) vs NPFCX (250). BIALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. NPFCX (12.74). BIALX return over 5 years is better than : 70.16 vs. NPFCX (31.00).
| BIALX | NPFCX | BIALX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.093 | 18.636 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | 12.74 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.80 | 60.09 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.16 | 31.00 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 215.61 | 90.01 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement