Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs GFAFX
BIAWX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs GFAFX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$57.06
Change+$0.77 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.4B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.82
Change+$0.71 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
BIAWX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAWX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAWX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. BIAWX (8.4B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIAWX: GFAFX (0.29) vs BIAWX (0.00). BIAWX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIAWX (13 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BIAWX (0.76) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BIAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: BIAWX (100) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.97 vs. BIAWX (3.57). BIAWX return over 5 years is better than : 68.18 vs. GFAFX (49.51).
| BIAWX | GFAFX | BIAWX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.67 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.357 | 19.062 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.4B | 340B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 17.97 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.40 | 62.69 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.18 | 49.51 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 253.80 | 105.65 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement